FF News: China 'lies,' says The Wolf of Wall Street, Omar Abdulla??
Bitcoin said to ‘drop,’ with Covid 19 woes, says “The Wolf of Wall Street,’ Omar Abdulla?? by Faaiza Ismail (19 February 2020-BBC) “The Wolf of Wall Street,’ Mr. Omar Abdulla is to have addressed members of the investment community this week, stated that the price of Bitcoin and other Chinese created Crypto Currencies related, are said to drop with the fundamental data of the Covid 19 virus, the slowdown of US growth and straddle economic data from The United States. “The Chinese pandemic has caused major losses to China, and thus impacting the growth on The United States. I would sell Bitcoin, Dollar, and perhaps hold the rand for some strength.’ he retired. Speaking to Footprints in Wuhan, local Chinese resident, Ms. Ameila Wang says that Wuhan has been locked down since 23 Jan 2020, and the death toll has almost reached 2000. “We are not even counting the dead bodies that have died at home, on the street, or mis-calculations from the Chinese government.’ The Economic Times reported that we should see some dollar and Bitcoin weakness as China has not been to over in over two months, already impacting the global sector. “Third world currencies is where we see the investment rise, as first world countries have already seen fears rise, and South Africa or even Africa has reported little or no cases.’ The Omar Abdulla Group which has investments into Bitcoin SA, Forex SA, Instagram SA and Facebook SA noted that they will be short-selling major currencies, buying into South African currencies and African shares. “We see opportunities to about April 2020, depending on the control of the virus.’ The World Health Organization is said to meet with President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping this week to bring the economic crisis to an upbeat. “China has already spent close to $4 billion dollars on the virus and a further n estimated $3 billion dollars wll be needed from The United States and The World Health Organization.’ The death toll has already reached 2000, with more than 70 000 cases reported, and we could see more short selling in the weeks to come, as China deals with Covid 19, ended a Wuhan resident. Message 6 of 7 (92 Views) Reply0 footprints Member 📷 Posts: 12
Re: FF News: The Omar Abdulla Group
Options Saturday Markets ‘calm down,’ as the world awaits more lies from China, says “The Wolf of Wall Street,’ Omar Abdulla…?? by Nabila Dockrat (2 March 2020—ABC NEWS) The Wolf of Wall Street Mr. Omar Abdulla says that China is reporting low number of cases the past several weeks whilst other Asian countries are starting to peak with new cases daily from South Korea, Japan Hong Kong and Singapore. “Maybe the other Asian countries are the ones to be trusted, instead of lying China,’ he told ABC NEWS. Another resident who spoke to Hubei Times looped that China has been injecting billions of dollars into their economy by stagnating the impact of Covid 19. “China has been injecting stimulus into their economy to keep the market alive. We believe that much more people have died at home, and China is keeping the numbers low so that people can get back to work.’ Addressing members of Washington, President Trump says that the Corona Virus Is ‘under control,’ and should see smaller numbers as Winter in China progresses. The Omar Abdulla Group which owns shares in Bitcoin SA, Forex SA, Instagram SA and Facebook SA added that investors were queuing to invest into GOLD and SILVER as these Commodities were known as ‘safe havens.’ “Markets have stayed away from the see-saw markets of China and The United States, and have Gold as the medium of trade.’ In other news, speaking to The Hong Kong Sun, local resident, Ms. Sue Ying cooled that the rest of Asia should be trusted with their numbers, and not the Chinese. “The Chinese government want to keep numbers low so that people can get to work, and not cause billions of other people in Asia to panic.’ Meanwhile, South African shares seem to have progressed during this flu season, as first world currencies have seen their money moved to third world currencies. “Markets have moved some of their investment into Africa and South Africa, as very few cases have been reported in these countries.’ Economist for The Omar Abdulla Group, Ms. Ayesha Noormahomed concluded her remarks to The Sunday Times that she expects the South African Rand to get stronger within the year, due to better economic data from South Africa and expects the Covid 19 virus to come to an end by April 2020. “We are already seeing low numbers from China, and although the virus is still not yet fully contained, we should see billions in China returning to work in coming days, which could see the Asian markets rise to market expectations.’
Earnings Commentary: Surprising GAAP EPS of -($0.03) caused by a combination of commodities, tariffs, recalls, Forex, and pensions. Revenue beat expectations but strength came largely from NA sales and perhaps signaled weakness in overseas markets. Not much specifics in the way of 2019 guidance. Liquidity is still good: cash on hand of $23.1b. Dividend should still be fine. Feel free to suggest additions / links in the comments below. EDIT: Results and links updated! Thank you everyone for commenting.
Originally posted by Darkstar at Forex Factory. Disclaimer: I did not write this. I found this post on ForexFactory written by a user called DarkStar, which I believe a lot of redditors will benefit from reading. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ There has been much discussion of late regarding borker spreads and liquidity. Many assumptions are being made about why spreads are widened during news time that are built on an incomplete knowledge of the architecture of the forex market in general. The purpose of this article is to dissect the market and hopefully shed some light on the situation so that a more rational and productive discussion can be undertaken by the Forex Factory members. We will begin with an explanation of the purpose of the Forex market and how it is utilized by its primary participants, expand into the structure and operation of the market, and conclude with the implications of this information for speculators. With that having been said, let us begin. Unlike the various bond and equity markets, the Forex market is not generally utilized as an investment medium. While speculation has a critical role in its proper function, the lion’s share of Forex transactions are done as a function of international business. The guy who buys a shiny new Eclipse more then likely will pay for it with US Dollars. Unfortunately Mitsubishi’s factory workers in Japan need to get their paychecks denominated in Yen, so at some point a conversion needs to be made. When one considers that companies like Exxon, Boeing, Sony, Dell, Honda, and thousands of other international businesses move nearly every dollar, real, yen, rubble, pound, and euro they make in a foreign country through the Forex market, it isn’t hard to understand how insignificant the speculative presence is; even in a $2tril per day market. By and large, businesses don’t much care about the intricacies of exchange rates, they just want to make and sell their products. As a central repository of a company’s money, it was only natural that the banks would be the facilitators of these transactions. In the old days it was easy enough for a bank to call a foreign bank (or a foreign branch of ones own bank) and swap the stockpiles of currency each had accumulated from their many customers. Just as any business would, the banks bought the foreign currency at one rate and marked it up before selling it to the customer. With that the foreign exchange spread was born. This was (and still is) a reasonable cost of doing business. Mitsubishi can pay its customers and the banks make a nice little profit for the hassle and risks associated with moving around the currency. As a byproduct of transacting all this business, bank traders developed the ability to speculate on the future of currency rates. Utilizing a better understanding of the market, a bank could quote a business a spread on the current rate but hold off hedging until a better one came along. This process allowed the banks to expand their net income dramatically. The unfortunate consequence was that liquidity was redistributed in a way that made certain transactions impossible to complete. It was for this reason and this reason alone that the market was eventually opened up to non-bank participants. The banks wanted more orders in the market so that a) they could profit from the less experienced participants, and b) the less experienced participants could provide a better liquidity distribution for execution of international business hedge orders. Initially only megacap hedge funds (such as Soros’s and others) were permitted, but it has since grown to include the retail brokerages and ECNs. Market Structure: Now that we have established why the market exists, let’s take a look at how the transactions are facilitated: The top tier of the Forex market is transacted on what is collectively known as the Interbank. Contrary to popular belief the Interbank is not an exchange; it is a collection of communication agreements between the world’s largest money center banks. To understand the structure of the Interbank market, it may be easier to grasp by way of analogy. Consider that in an office (or maybe even someone’s home) there are multiple computers connected via a network cable. Each computer operates independently of the others until it needs a resource that another computer possesses. At that point it will contact the other computer and request access to the necessary resource. If the computer is working properly and its owner has given the requestor authorization to do so, the resource can be accessed and the initiating computers request can be fulfilled. By substituting computers for banks and resources for currency, you can easily grasp the relationships that exist on the Interbank. Anyone who has ever tried to find resources on a computer network without a server can appreciate how difficult it can be to keep track of who has what resources. The same issue exists on the Interbank market with regard to prices and currency inventory. A bank in Singapore may only rarely transact business with a company that needs to exchange some Brazilian Real and it can be very difficult to establish what a proper exchange rate should be. It is for this purpose that EBS and Reuters (hereafter EBS) established their services. Layered on top (in a manner of speaking) of the Interbank communication links, the EBS service enables banks to see how much and at what prices all the Interbank members are willing to transact. Pains should be taken to express that EBS is not a market or a market maker; it is an application used to see bids and offers from the various banks. The second tier of the market exists essential within each bank. By calling your local Bank of America branch you can exchange any foreign currency you would like. More then likely they will just move some excess currency from one branch to another. Since this is a micro-exchange with a single counterparty, you are basically at their mercy as to what exchange rate they will quote you. Your choice is to accept their offer or shop a different bank. Everyone who trades the forex market should visit their bank at least once to get a few quotes. It would be very enlightening to see how lucrative these transactions really are. Branching off of this second tier is the third tier retail market. When brokers like Oanda, Forex.com, FXCM, etc. desire to establish a retail operation the first thing they need is a liquidity provider. Nine in ten of these brokers will sign an agreement with just one bank. This bank will agree to provide liquidity if and only if they can hedge it on EBS inclusive of their desired spread. Because the volume will be significantly higher a single bank patron will transact, the spreads will be much more competitive. By no means should it be expected these tier 3 providers will be quoted precisely what exists on the Interbank. Remember the bank is in the business of collecting spreads and no agreement is going to suspend that priority. Retail forex is almost akin to running a casino. The majority of its participants have zero understanding how to trade effectively and as a result are consistent losers. The spread system combined with a standard probability distribution of returns gives the broker a built in house advantage of a few percentage points. As a result, they have all built internal order matching systems that play one loser off against a winner and collect the spread. On the occasions when disequilibrium exists within the internal order book, the broker hedges any exposure with their tier 2 liquidity provider. As bad as this may sound, there are some significant advantages for speculators that deal with them. Because it is an internal order book, many features can be provided which are otherwise unavailable through other means. Non-standard contract sizes, high leverage on tiny account balances, and the ability to transact in a commission free environment are just a few of them… An ECN operates similar to a Tier 2 bank, but still exists on the third tier. An ECN will generally establish agreements with several tier 2 banks for liquidity. However instead of matching orders internally, it will just pass through the quotes from the banks, as is, to be traded on. It’s sort of an EBS for little guys. There are many advantages to the model, but it is still not the Interbank. The banks are going to make their spread or their not go to waste their time. Depending on the bank this will take the form of price shading or widened spreads depending on market conditions. The ECN, for its trouble, collects a commission on each transaction. Aside from the commission factor, there are some other disadvantages a speculator should consider before making the leap to an ECN. Most offer much lower leverage and only allow full lot transactions. During certain market conditions, the banks may also pull their liquidity leaving traders without an opportunity to enter or exit positions at their desired price. Trade Mechanics: It is convenient to believe that in a $2tril per day market there is always enough liquidity to do what needs to be done. Unfortunately belief does not negate the reality that for every buyer there MUST be a seller or no transaction can occur. When an order is too large to transact at the current price, the price moves to the point where open interest is abundant enough to cover it. Every time you see price move a single pip, it means that an order was executed that consumed (or otherwise removed) the open interest at the current price. There is no other way that prices can move. As we covered earlier, each bank lists on EBS how much and at what price they are willing to transact a currency. It is important to note that no Interbank participant is under any obligation to make a transaction if they do not feel it is in their best interest. There are no “market makers” on the Interbank; only speculators and hedgers. Looking at an ECN platform or Level II data on the stock market, one can get a feel for what the orders on EBS look like. The following is a sample representation: You’ll notice that there is open interest (Level II Vol figures) of various sizes at different price points. Each one of those units represents existing limit orders and in this example, each unit is $1mil in currency. Using this information, if a market sell order was placed for 38.4mil, the spread would instantly widen from 2.5 pips to 4.5 pips because there would no longer be any orders between 1.56300 and 1.56345. No broker, market maker, bank, or thief in the night widened the spread; it was the natural byproduct of the order that was placed. If no additional orders entered the market, the spread would remain this large forever. Fortunately, someone somewhere will deem a price point between those 2 figures an appropriate opportunity to do something and place an order. That order will either consume more interest or add to it, depending whether it is a market or limit order respectively. What would have happened if someone placed a market sell order for 2mil just 1 millisecond after that 38.4 mil order hit? They would have been filled at 1.5630 Why were they “slipped”? Because there was no one to take the other side of the transaction at 1.56320 any longer. Again, nobody was out screwing the trader; it was the natural byproduct of the order flow. A more interesting question is, what would happen if all the listed orders where suddenly canceled? The spread would widen to a point at which there were existing bids and offers. That may be 5,7,9, or even 100 pips; it is going to widen to whatever the difference between a bid and an offer are. Notice that nobody came in and “set” the spread, they just refused to transact at anything between it. Nothing can be done to force orders into existence that don’t exist. Regardless what market is being examined or what broker is facilitating transactions, it is impossible to avoid spreads and slippage. They are a fact of life in the realm of trading. Implications for speculators: Trading has been characterized as a zero sum game, and rightly so. If trader A sells a security to trader B and the price goes up, trader A lost money that they otherwise could have made. If it goes down, Trader A made money from trader B’s mistake. Even in a huge market like the Forex, each transaction must have a buyer and a seller to make a trade and one of them is going to lose. In the general realm of trading, this is materially irrelevant to each participant. But there are certain situations where it becomes of significant importance. One of those situations is a news event. Much has been made of late about how it is immoral, illegal, or downright evil for a broker, bank, or other liquidity provider to withdraw their order (increasing the spread) and slip orders (as though it was a conscious decision on their part to do so) more then normal during these events. These things occur for very specific reasons which have nothing to do with screwing anyone. Let us examine why: Leading up to an economic report for example, certain traders will enter into positions expecting the news to go a certain way. As the event becomes immanent, the banks on the Interbank will remove their speculative orders for fear of taking unnecessary losses. Technical traders will pull their orders as well since it is common practice for them to avoid the news. Hedge funds and other macro traders are either already positioned or waiting until after the news hits to make decisions dependent on the result. Knowing what we now know, where is the liquidity necessary to maintain a tight spread coming from? Moving down the food chain to Tier 2; a bank will only provide liquidity to an ECN or retail broker if they can instantly hedge (plus their requisite spread) the positions on Interbank. If the Interbank spreads are widening due to lower liquidity, the bank is going to have to widen the spreads on the downstream players as well. At tier 3 the ECN’s are simply passing the banks offers on, so spreads widen up to their customers. The retailers that guarantee spreads of 2 to 5 pips have just opened a gaping hole in their risk profile since they can no longer hedge their net exposure (ever wonder why they always seem to shut down or requote until its over?). The variable spread retailers in turn open up their spreads to match what is happening at the bank or they run into the same problems fixed spreads broker are dealing with. Now think about this situation for a second. What is going to happen when a number misses expectations? How many traders going into the event with positions chose wrong and need to get out ASAP? How many hedge funds are going to instantly drop their macro orders? How many retail traders’ straddle orders just executed? How many of them were waiting to hear a miss and executed market orders? With the technical traders on the sidelines, who is going to be stupid enough to take the other side of all these orders? The answer is no one. Between 1 and 5 seconds after the news hits it is a purely a 1 way market. That big long pin bar that occurs is a grand total of 2 prices; the one before the news hit and the one after. The 10, 20, or 30 pips between them is called a gap. Is it any wonder that slippage is in evidence at this time? Conclusions: Each tier of the Forex market has its own inherent advantages and disadvantages. Depending on your priorities you have to make a choice between what restrictions you can live with and those you cant. Unfortunately, you can’t always get what you want. By focusing on slippage and spreads, which are the natural byproduct of order flow, one is not only pursuing a futile ideal, they are passing up an enormous opportunity to capitalize on true inefficiencies. News events are one of the few times where a large number of players are positioned inappropriately and it is fairly easy to profit from their foolishness. If a trader truly wants to make the leap to the next level of profitability they should be spending their time figuring out how identify these positions and trading with the goal of capturing the price movement they inevitably will cause. Nobody is going to make the argument that a broker is a trader’s best friend, but they still provide a valuable service and should be compensated for their efforts. By accepting a broker for what it is and learning how to work within the limitations of the relationship, traders have access to a world of opportunity that they otherwise could never dream of capturing. Let us all remember that simple truth.
I just wanna ask if any of you guys have any advice or guidance on straddling forex news (non farm, interest rates) best expiry date to choose and trade place time. At the moment I am placing the trade around 2 days before with expiry date on the day of news announcement (or closest) up around 6% over the last 4 weeks (paper trading) Can anyone relate to this? Many thanks J
Advantages of The Straddle Trading Strategy. an easy forex news trading strategy; it is really reliable trading system if there are no price whipsaws before or just after the news is released, and also if price does not move past the support and resistance levels before the news is released. Welcome to the Forex straddle trading tutorial with my Metatrader Trade Panel. This approach is used by a lot of news traders. They place a buy stop above a technical high, and a sell stop below a technical low – when the news data is announced, they hope to catch a breakout as the market moves through one of the two pending orders. Forex glossary: ask-bid, Forex Volatility etc. Forex glossary — basic terms and concepts of the Forex market Forex books Forex literature: Forex as viewed by professional traders Tutorial Forex trading tutorial The biggest challenge in using the straddle trade is that of whipsaw. Whipsaw happens most often when the market is assimilating new information. It can give rise to ferocious swings of price that will trigger both sides of the straddle. It doesn’t just happen on news releases. Forex News Trading: You absolutely have to have software to make a straddle strategy work,a manual system is …nada!!!. With this software, suddenly, market direction becomes irrelevant – you can profit if it moves in EITHER direction!
Scalping The News with Forex Trading Part 2 (7% ROI in 2 Minutes)
One of the best ways to profit from Forex Trading is to trade on market moving news. When major news is released, forex prices tend to move rapidly and knowing how to jump in and out quickly to ... Scalping The News with Forex Trading Part 2 (7% ROI in 2 Minutes) - Duration: 9:16. Adam Khoo 132,009 views. 9:16. Straddle is a Classic News trading Strategy that works for all markets, Equity, F&O, Commodity or be it Forex trading. It's an emotionless approach to trading big moves after a News or Data release. How to Trade USD / CAD News Trading in Forex, 600$ in 1 min - Duration: 12:14. Sasan FX1 26,894 views. 12:14. How To Trade The NFP And Make Profit 100% - Duration: 7:49. Forex Straddle Trading Strategies Explained - MT4 & MT5 Trade Panel Feature Tutorial - Duration: 16:07. Dale Woods 7,573 views. 16:07.